Frustration
A supervening event destroys the purpose of the contract, excusing performance though performance remains physically possible.
On the MBE, the tell is that performance is still perfectly doable but worthless to one party because some outside event gutted the reason for contracting. Watch the call: the exam wants you to choose between frustration of purpose and impracticability, and the hinge is whether performance became pointless (frustration) or impossible/extremely burdensome (impracticability). On foreseeability, the modern Restatement treats it as one factor in whether the event was a basic assumption — not an automatic bar — though older banks still phrase it as “foreseeable = assumed the risk = no excuse.” A mere drop in profitability never frustrates.
Don’t confuse it with mistake, which concerns a fact already wrong at the moment of contracting, not a later supervening event — frustration always points forward. And frustration is a defense excusing nonperformance, so the excused party has not committed a breach; if the doctrine fails, that same nonperformance flips into a breach. Hook: frustration means the deal still works but no longer matters.
PlayPrepHQ study notes are written and reviewed against primary exam sources. How we create & review content →